vovatraders.blogg.se - Pixelmator vs photoshop

#Pixelmator vs photoshop pro

Affinity Photo 2 is clearly playing in a different league (but not in a good way).

#Pixelmator vs photoshop pro

Pixelmator Pro is not too bad either with only a few seconds behind the Photoshop. Not only is faster than the other programs it is also consistent across different images. Here are the measured results in seconds:Īs can be seen from those numbers Adobe Photshop is the clear winner when it comes to performance.

Export results as 3000px by 3000px at 70% Jpegįor the timing results I measure the wall clock time between the to moment I started the fill operation to the moment the operation had been completed and the hole was filled on the screen.

Increase selection slightly to cover some of the sky (unfortunately there is no uniform way to adjust the selection across the different programs).My approach on evaluating the different approaches was to execute each of the following steps for each programm and sample inputs:

Represent the most common skys I usually encounter: The images are the top cube of different merged panoramas (they are also show in the cover image). Adobe Photoshop (I used the content aware fill method and not the new content aware will as that on is harder to time and much much slower and seems to result in worse output in my experience)įor my testing.In this article I will compare the different content aware implementations of these popular photo editing solutions: There are several ways to fix those issues. One issue, especially with drone shots, is that there are some blind spots which cause the final image to have holes. I recently got into 360 degree photography. Pixelmator Pro Photoshop Affinity Photo 2 Comparing Content Aware Fill Implementations